The Washington Observer

The Washington Observer

Share this post

The Washington Observer
The Washington Observer
Fair Start for Kids was landmark legislation. So why are lawmakers talking cuts?

Fair Start for Kids was landmark legislation. So why are lawmakers talking cuts?

Plus some recommended reading/watching and a new way to absorb The Observer

Sara Kassabian's avatar
Paul Queary's avatar
Tim Gruver's avatar
Sara Kassabian
,
Paul Queary
, and
Tim Gruver
Dec 20, 2024
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

The Washington Observer
The Washington Observer
Fair Start for Kids was landmark legislation. So why are lawmakers talking cuts?
1
1
Share

While the state’s $10-12 billion budget deficit looms over the upcoming session, program cuts might be inevitable even as the Democratic majority looks to new revenue. So far, the sacrificial lamb seems to be the planned increases to early learning and child care programs built into the Fair Start for Kids Act about three years ago.

Fair Start funneled more than $1 billion into early learning and child care programs. The law aimed to make these expensive services more accessible for low-income families by increasing subsidies and income eligibility and growing the child care workforce and infrastructure statewide.

Fair Start included plans for future spending to grow the state-sponsored programs. Bringing the programs into the 2025-27 biennium would cost the state about $1B, which is one of the main reasons why Democrats have been talking about kicking that can down the road.

brown-red-and-black wooden toys
Photo by Matiinu Ramadhan on Unsplash

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Washington Observer to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 The Washington Observer LLC
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share